Stremf in Numbers
Battlestargalactica@retrospective
Just finished Battlestar Galactica. Overall impressions, likes, dislikes and spoilers follow:
The twist at the end was great. Cylon and human in endless cycle of creation, evolution and destruction was a creative touch. Universe as endless cycle is the best philosophical explanation for the meaning of the existence. And, I will admit to not seeing that twist coming.
It was very easy to hate Gaius Baltar for 60-some episodes, but the final two minutes of exposition was a clean, simple explanations for a previously inexplicable plot crutch. Hat tip to the writers and to everyone who ever followed a self-destructive romantic urge.
There are some things about this series that absolutely worked
- Edward James Olmos makes this show happen. I think he holds together the campiest elements with an acting style that gets THIS close to camp without stepping over the line, and he deserves kudos for that.
- Picking "All Along the Watchtower" as the key humanities survival was awesome. Picking the Jimi Hendrix version was the coup d'grace. Some covers actually are better than the originals.
- Starbuck was my favorite female character in a TV series since Deanna Troi.
- The cinematography and stage sets were top notch.
Complaints? Don't mind if I do.
- Why did the series feel the need to inject some highly unbelievable elements? A sage critic put it thusly: "Sometimes science fiction authors think that writing about make-believe give them license to make you believe anything. Just because it's fiction doesn't mean you can make up anything willy-nilly. The best stories are those with reasonable plots and plausible dialogue." It's ridiculously, absurdly unbelievable that they would launch the ships into the sun after they discovered the "real" earth. Survive a trip across the galaxy and a species-threatening war, only to throw your most useful resources into a hydrogen-powered dustbin? C'mon.
- Generic, knock-off key characters like this guy can take a flying leap. How can I get invested in someone that vanilla and replaceable? Particularly since he's supposed to a MEXICAN lead character's son. C'mon, was Lou Diamond Phillips not available?
- The vignette-ettes featuring the producers at the end of the credits were always entertaining and creative. So imagine my chagrin when they used a repeat for the credits forthe final episode. For shame.
The Last Supper
(This is culled from a recent discussion among some friends.)
What 12 living individuals would you invite to your Last Supper?
Here's some of the more colorful nominees, with commentary from the nominator or myself.
Adam Carolla - "One of the few original voices in entertainment."
Warren Buffett - "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he was an aww-shucks sodbuster from Omaha. Actually, he certainly has a good act going but I think he's mostly transparent."
Christopher Hitchens - "I don't think I've ever been this sad to see a stranger go. Even more than Vonnegut."
Osama Bin Laden - I think he could hold his own rhetorically, and it would be nice to hear his motivations in front of capable, politically "neutral" dissenting voices.
Francis Collins ("Christian" genetic scientist) - The dude actually holds him own in an edited debate with Bill Maher. That's saying something.
Roger Ebert - "I've been following him on twitter for a few months now and I read his blog posts from time to time. He's very opinionated and I don't always agree with him but he's a very smart and well informed dude and he knows how to write."
Stephen King - "Anyone that can write so insightfully about what makes people scared has got be good at a cocktail party. You really should check out some of his non-horror books. King was quoted as calling conservative commentator Glenn Beck "Satan's mentally challenged younger brother. How could you not want a guy like that at your table?" Clay Shirky - "Maybe he's a prophet, maybe he's just a basement nerd with a podium. He's brilliant."
Penn Gillette - "Big Funny guy. Lots of charisma, won't dominate the conversation but will definitely bring quite a bit to it. Smart outspoken athiest like Chrissy Hitchy, but with manners. Will do magic tricks if dinner gets awkward."
Labels: Kids table: Beck, Limbaugh, O'Reilly
Eight beautiful commercials, Super Bowl and otherwise
27 years later
this is still the gold standard by which all commercials are measured. But a gazillion dollars of advertising haven't been a complete waste. There are some gems floating on the radio spectrum to the outer galaxy.
These commercials were culled from my own memories and the nominations of friends. It's more heavily weighted to recent years, but who cares. No order either. Free-form Artist's Tuesday.
(Apologies that these links don't open in a separate tab. I'm still a technical noob.)
My favorite sports commercial as a kid. I don't really remember why, although its hard not get infected with that triumphant tune. I love it now because there's nothing more difficult or more rewarding then getting up in the morning and making a training session the first thing you do.
The world is, in fact, just awesome.
A lot of classmates had these posters up in their rooms in college. That may be the only stereotypical trope from college that I never got annoyed with. Apple has, obviously, outgrown the image of innovative outsider. Ad copy can be beautiful when delivered simply and without irony: "The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do."
Social media blahbity blahbity. BUT! it's very cool to see a commercial that connects our emotions with our technology.
"Institutional advertising" that tries to raise awareness for a brand seems less common than it used to be, maybe because there are better segment markets to advertise in than national network platforms. But commercials that appeal to your sense of community, patriotism and altruism will almost always get and keep my attention.
No narrative to this one, but it makes the list thanks to a beautiful soundtrack, an intricate and expensive live-action shoot (no special effects) and for spelling colors the British way.
If I had to pick a commercial to put in a time capsule to communicate the human condition to an alien race, this would be the one. It would be hard to find a commercial that captures more emotion with better economy. And god damn if that crescendo doesn't give you the chills.
A couple favorite shots:
Julie Moss crawling across the Ironman finish line (0:31)
Derek Redmond getting carried across the finish line by his dad (0:49)
Great music, great visuals and a wrenching narrative twist. Paging all hopeless romantics.
Labels: Why can't more commercials be entertaining?
Idaho v. Oregon v. New York
People like to talk about the differences between locales. This is a fun game, but usually magnifies the effect of pretty small differences, or ends up being another way to reiterate the impact of geography, weather, or time since settlement.
I've lived in 3 states in the past 6 years, all while working for the same company. Despite significant geographic and demographic differences between each of these states, my colleagues live achingly similar lives.
Here are the most significant differences for upper-middle class people between each location, in my opinion:
1) Idaho - White collar professionals live extremely well in Idaho relative to other states. I had friends at my firm with one income, four kids, and school loans who were able to afford a boat and two new cars. I recognize this has changed a bit, since house prices are still a fair amount lower than the rest of the nation, I think this is still true.
2) Oregon - Community participation is highly valued across all religious and political persuasions. This can take the form of volunteering, charitable contributions or simply attending local beer and wine festivals. This happens on a much more limited scale in Idaho and not at all in New York.
3) New York - Class envy is the order of the day. I've always read about how intense this emotion is on the East coast, and everything I read was right. NJ natives have a complex about not being from NYC, lawyers are jealous of bankers, Columbia alums speak disparagingly of Harvard, and on up the food chain. I imagine the Giulianis love to put pins in their Bloomberg voodoo doll.
Greatly overstated differences:
1) Idaho - The impact of religion (particularly LDS) is greatly overstated. The Mormons I know don't have have secular friends, similarly for Christians and the irreligious. (It really sucks that there isn't a better word to describe sanity) Yes, it's a hard-right Republican state, but unless you're trying to get birth control at 10pm or liquor on a Sunday, this doesn't much affect your day to day life. The one exception I will readily grant is that Mormons absolutely protect their own in a business setting.
2) Oregon - Being "green". Please. Friends who drove Toyota Priuses would take MULTIPLE international trips on a flying environmental cigar.
3) New York - The impact on day to day life of the "melting pot" of New York is dramatically overstated. Other than your subway ride and ordering your Subway sandwich, you are highly unlikely to interact with multiple races in a day.
Labels: Homogeinity: Not just for gays anymore
Path Dependency
Slate's been running a series of articles called "Future Shock", wherein leading scientists discuss the developmental future of various technologies. The most recent article discussed the past, and future of rocket development, including the two main functions of rocketry: 1) delivering payloads into space and 2) delivering nuclear weapons across an ocean.
By the way, it doesn't get geekier than spending an afternoon reading about the development of rockets.
One of the author's central contentions is that rockets have developed to within a very small margin of their engineering envelope. This is partially due to the physical of gravity and thermodynamics, but is also a result of the path we used to develop rocketry. That is, the decisions made by Robert Goddard in developing the first rockets determined the universe of possible engineering solutions available to later engineers.
This phenomenon is known as path dependence (Wiki here). Path dependence explains how the set of decisions one faces for any given circumstance is limited by the decisions one has made in the past, even though past circumstances may no longer be relevant
It's true for rockets, and true for our lives. The unfortunate conclusion is that many of our early life choices establish a ceiling for our possibilities. But there is an upside to this fatalism. Despite our best efforts to screw our lives up, we've usually established a floor.
Labels: How we have we not blown ourselves to smithereens?
Elva Alice Williams
My grandma was a force of nature.
Our debt to her as a family can't be measured.
It may be that our mythology about the Depression has outgrown its reality. But the Depression shaped everything about her view of the world. Savings and security were first, and first always.
That, and pride. She told the story that in elementary school all her family could afford was a peach sandwich, with two peach halves in bread. So, she would go behind the cafeteria and eat her lunch in private. That fierce defiance of her circumstances continued through her poverty, her lifelong marriage to an alcoholic, philandering husband and her commitment to instill a powerful sense of pride and self-worth in her children.
Carrying a family of alcoholics, high school dropouts and criminals up out of poverty, into college, and across the middle class threshold is no mean feat. Doing that all as a woman, in mid-20th century America, with little more than a high school education is nothing short of remarkable.
Labels: Thank you
February Doldrums
February is the worst month of the year. I've always called them the "February Doldrums" because you're tired of the cold and the pace of summer is too far away to picture clearly.
7 years after my last semester of college, I still find myself thinking in terms of winter = school/summer = break. Working for a company with a May fiscal year end probably exacerbates that.
You can take things even farther back in time and see that it's interesting that our agrarian rhythms live on long after we've disconnected ourselves from any actual reliance on the cycle of the seasons.
Labels: books, bosses' dirty looks, Lessons
The Modern Aristocracy
Arguments about the equity/efficiency trade-off in regards to taxes do have their merits. I believe this is one policy area where neither side is clearly right, although I do think marginal tax rates on the upper brackets should be increased (if not to 1970s levels).
The case for a higher estate tax seems clear cut. I have yet to see any believable evidence that a higher marginal estate tax would disincentive people to work harder during their lives. A lower tax *may* encourage people to save more, but America needs more spending and less saving, so I don't think this is a desirable outcome.
The dark side of lower taxes on estates is that we inculcate our own version of the European aristocracy as wealth continues to grow across generations. We saw how that worked out.
Labels: The Divine Right of Prep School Alumni